top | item 39334406 (no title) timmb | 2 years ago I disagree, I think it means “my actions have demonstrated that I’m not trying to cover anything up” discuss order hn newest munch117|2 years ago That's my interpretation as well.It doesn't put him in a much better light, though. It's like he's so incompetent that he didn't even realise that there was something that needed covering up. anjc|2 years ago There wasn't something that needed covering up. If he'd reported the methodology in the paper there would have been no issues.It's likely that this was omitted from the paper as an oversight; such imputation likely wouldn't have affected the outcome of peer review.
munch117|2 years ago That's my interpretation as well.It doesn't put him in a much better light, though. It's like he's so incompetent that he didn't even realise that there was something that needed covering up. anjc|2 years ago There wasn't something that needed covering up. If he'd reported the methodology in the paper there would have been no issues.It's likely that this was omitted from the paper as an oversight; such imputation likely wouldn't have affected the outcome of peer review.
anjc|2 years ago There wasn't something that needed covering up. If he'd reported the methodology in the paper there would have been no issues.It's likely that this was omitted from the paper as an oversight; such imputation likely wouldn't have affected the outcome of peer review.
munch117|2 years ago
It doesn't put him in a much better light, though. It's like he's so incompetent that he didn't even realise that there was something that needed covering up.
anjc|2 years ago
It's likely that this was omitted from the paper as an oversight; such imputation likely wouldn't have affected the outcome of peer review.