top | item 39382529 (no title) timmb | 2 years ago Because they would have obviously known it was their friend making a joke. discuss order hn newest lolyyy2|2 years ago I don't think they could have known for sure it was a joke. cal85|2 years ago The judge’s point is that if they want to sue anyone for misleading them, it should be whoever sent them the message. He’s not saying they would necessarily win that hypothetical case. chatmasta|2 years ago So why shouldn't Snapchat (who presumably reported it to the government) be charged for the same offense of reporting a non-threat?I'm not suggesting they should be, but just following the same logic as your comment.
lolyyy2|2 years ago I don't think they could have known for sure it was a joke. cal85|2 years ago The judge’s point is that if they want to sue anyone for misleading them, it should be whoever sent them the message. He’s not saying they would necessarily win that hypothetical case.
cal85|2 years ago The judge’s point is that if they want to sue anyone for misleading them, it should be whoever sent them the message. He’s not saying they would necessarily win that hypothetical case.
chatmasta|2 years ago So why shouldn't Snapchat (who presumably reported it to the government) be charged for the same offense of reporting a non-threat?I'm not suggesting they should be, but just following the same logic as your comment.
lolyyy2|2 years ago
cal85|2 years ago
chatmasta|2 years ago
I'm not suggesting they should be, but just following the same logic as your comment.