[hackideiomat]

They do not take security and privacy seriously

[elaus]

Could you elaborate? I didn't find anything in the change log that made this obvious to me.

[hackideiomat]

Ha, exactly! They rarely fix bugs.

E.g., XSS / HTML injection in summarizer or discuss document. Or their broken CSP which allows injecting forms to e.g., change settings.

They haven't fixed many reported issues in a while, and just to prove I'm not lying: https://kagi.com/discussdoc?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkagi.com%2Fcha...

[WhyNotHugo]

Regarding privacy: an obvious point is that you need to log in to use the search engine, so each search is tied to a unique user. Given that payment is involved, each user can be tied to a real-world identity.

[mdekkers]

> They do not take security and privacy seriously

Anything specific about the privacy angle?

[eitland]

So which search engine do you recommend that takes privacy seriously and that actually works (i.e. doesn't block me and return correct results) in Norway?

[hackideiomat]

Maybe MetaGer if you can live with their quality

[rcMgD2BwE72F]

Still far better than all the alternatives, no?

[hackideiomat]

Don't get me wrong, I do use kagi. but it's not nearly what I wish it'd be.

[Nullabillity]

The alternatives don't demand your payment details.

[BOOSTERHIDROGEN]

Which privacy ?