top | item 39402083 (no title) dupertrooper | 2 years ago Umm but you can’t find a current version of Word that actually does that. Try it sometime. discuss order hn newest EvanAnderson|2 years ago Here's a rather large (5MB) vintage 1996 Microsoft Word document: https://archive.org/download/cd-pn-0527a/CD_ROM.ISO/APPENDIX...That file opens and appears to render just fine for me in Word 2016.This has been my experience w/ Office files in general. Old files open and render very well in newer versions. weinzierl|2 years ago The point made above was "opens exactly as expected". So, does it look like the authors intended in 1996? I doubt it. load replies (2) judge2020|2 years ago Was able to do it just fine with these government files[0,1] I found on Google. Word version 16.82 on Mac (Apple Silicon too).0: https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legis/LI/uconsCheck.cfm....1: https://archive.ada.gov/briefs/andersbr.doc weinzierl|2 years ago The point made above was "opens exactly as expected". So, does it look like the authors intended in 1996? I doubt it.
EvanAnderson|2 years ago Here's a rather large (5MB) vintage 1996 Microsoft Word document: https://archive.org/download/cd-pn-0527a/CD_ROM.ISO/APPENDIX...That file opens and appears to render just fine for me in Word 2016.This has been my experience w/ Office files in general. Old files open and render very well in newer versions. weinzierl|2 years ago The point made above was "opens exactly as expected". So, does it look like the authors intended in 1996? I doubt it. load replies (2)
weinzierl|2 years ago The point made above was "opens exactly as expected". So, does it look like the authors intended in 1996? I doubt it. load replies (2)
judge2020|2 years ago Was able to do it just fine with these government files[0,1] I found on Google. Word version 16.82 on Mac (Apple Silicon too).0: https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legis/LI/uconsCheck.cfm....1: https://archive.ada.gov/briefs/andersbr.doc weinzierl|2 years ago The point made above was "opens exactly as expected". So, does it look like the authors intended in 1996? I doubt it.
weinzierl|2 years ago The point made above was "opens exactly as expected". So, does it look like the authors intended in 1996? I doubt it.
EvanAnderson|2 years ago
That file opens and appears to render just fine for me in Word 2016.
This has been my experience w/ Office files in general. Old files open and render very well in newer versions.
weinzierl|2 years ago
judge2020|2 years ago
0: https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legis/LI/uconsCheck.cfm....
1: https://archive.ada.gov/briefs/andersbr.doc
weinzierl|2 years ago