(no title)
ribelo
|
2 years ago
Helix is a very good and well-managed project, but it's quite hostile towards its own community. There are no plugins, and they won't be in Wasm like users want, but in Scheme dialect named Steel, that nobody want... if at all. Missing features like copilot or file browser expected by the community are essentially never merged into the master. This might be a better path than total dispersion and destruction of what works, but my expectations do not align with what the creators offer, so I give them the freedom to choose. I keep my fingers crossed for its development, but I personally use something else.
e12e|2 years ago
In a "batteries included" edit a service like copilot that expose all data to a third party is a terrible anti-feature.
As for script-oriented plugins vs wasm - I see a tradeoff - and don't think neither are right or wrong.
Cross editor plugins via a common wasm api might be fun, but perhaps not very practical.
Edit: link to relevant issues and discussion:
https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/3806#discu...
https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/122
https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/1927
ribelo|2 years ago
Regarding plugins, I'm with Helix from the beginning, i have read everything, and I understand the motivation well and can accept it. Perhaps this is what the ideal editor looks like for creators, but it definitely doesn't look like the ideal editor for me. I respect their decision, but I'm sticking with Neovim and might switch to ZED when Linux support becomes available.
jupblb|2 years ago
WuxiFingerHold|2 years ago
ribelo|2 years ago