top | item 39425261 (no title) curryhoward | 2 years ago Citation needed on "well-established". I find myself often benefiting from Haskell's disciplined approach to effects. discuss order hn newest refulgentis|2 years ago " (beyond the well-established Haskell-esque effects bad)"read that as:"beyond the well-established idea, from Haskell, that side effects are troublesome and need to be explicitly modelled and thought about." curryhoward|2 years ago Ah, I think your clarification makes a lot more sense than your original phrasing, because Haskell's position is indeed that side effects are bad, not that effects are bad. The bad thing is "side", not "effects".
refulgentis|2 years ago " (beyond the well-established Haskell-esque effects bad)"read that as:"beyond the well-established idea, from Haskell, that side effects are troublesome and need to be explicitly modelled and thought about." curryhoward|2 years ago Ah, I think your clarification makes a lot more sense than your original phrasing, because Haskell's position is indeed that side effects are bad, not that effects are bad. The bad thing is "side", not "effects".
curryhoward|2 years ago Ah, I think your clarification makes a lot more sense than your original phrasing, because Haskell's position is indeed that side effects are bad, not that effects are bad. The bad thing is "side", not "effects".
refulgentis|2 years ago
read that as:
"beyond the well-established idea, from Haskell, that side effects are troublesome and need to be explicitly modelled and thought about."
curryhoward|2 years ago