Good one (for real, it made me chuckle) but really it's "I told you we should reinstate all the banking and financial restrictions that came into force in the 1930s because financiers and bankers can't be trusted to regulate themselves. Now we got this"
There’s no need for more regulation— this is working as intended. It will all be worked out by the checks and balances inherent to modern American capitalism. That is, when the banks’ balances are low, the government writes them huge checks to cover it. See? No need to panic: The market always does what’s right in the long run for bank shareholders and executives.
a recruiter for a company with a hybrid schedule that i balked at had starting telling me about the economic implications of not using offices, how the building value would go down, and shops nearby wouldn’t have traffic and loans against all of them would go delinquent
and I asked if that was the company’s stance for their office park
and no, it was just a vicarious interest in commercial real estate doomer articles
passwordoops|2 years ago
delichon|2 years ago
chefandy|2 years ago
yieldcrv|2 years ago
and I asked if that was the company’s stance for their office park
and no, it was just a vicarious interest in commercial real estate doomer articles
simping for corporate