top | item 39465903

(no title)

pmeunier | 2 years ago

First, thanks for the patient and kind advice. This is so rare I didn't even know you were allowed to talk like that online.

> I think you should try to let go of the idea of "evolving the license" of an open source project that invites contributions.

Yes, this is becoming clearer now, but wasn't for a long time, since choosing any license on a complicated tool like this one, which few people fully understand, inevitably sparks discussions on the license, because if you got to say something, it is easier to discuss than commutativity, pushouts (hard-core theory), Sanakirja, endianness (hard-core practice).

> This is quite a neat trick to pull off, although I fear it was unintentional.

;-)

> Yeah I saw that PR

There were many: a single one wouldn't have changed my mind. And many more on what projects/topics/software I should be interested in.

discuss

order

No comments yet.