top | item 39466094 (no title) FreeFull | 2 years ago How would that work for having a layer larger than the image? discuss order hn newest beAbU|2 years ago The layer is automatically masked by the boundaries of the image. This is how it works in most other layer based tools that I've seen. dijit|2 years ago Isn't this a severe limitation of rasterized image editors?(Speaking from ignorance as someone who only did some mild graphics design work using fireworks in the mid-00's for forums).Would it mean that anything that exists outside of the visible canvas would be cropped on save? load replies (3) p0nce|2 years ago I could live with that. unknown|2 years ago [deleted]
beAbU|2 years ago The layer is automatically masked by the boundaries of the image. This is how it works in most other layer based tools that I've seen. dijit|2 years ago Isn't this a severe limitation of rasterized image editors?(Speaking from ignorance as someone who only did some mild graphics design work using fireworks in the mid-00's for forums).Would it mean that anything that exists outside of the visible canvas would be cropped on save? load replies (3) p0nce|2 years ago I could live with that.
dijit|2 years ago Isn't this a severe limitation of rasterized image editors?(Speaking from ignorance as someone who only did some mild graphics design work using fireworks in the mid-00's for forums).Would it mean that anything that exists outside of the visible canvas would be cropped on save? load replies (3)
beAbU|2 years ago
dijit|2 years ago
(Speaking from ignorance as someone who only did some mild graphics design work using fireworks in the mid-00's for forums).
Would it mean that anything that exists outside of the visible canvas would be cropped on save?
p0nce|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]