(no title)
iav
|
2 years ago
Not to overcomplicate things, but anyone planning to save money for >12 months should be using the BOXX ETF (https://etfsite.alphaarchitect.com/boxx/) to convert the interest income into a long-term capital gain. Even if you end up cashing out before the 12 months, you are still going to pay the same taxes as with a savings account, so there is truly no downside.
ca_tech|2 years ago
infecto|2 years ago
For those of us who cannot resolve archive link.
Article https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-02-22/this-exch...
Matt Levine's https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-02-22/put-th...
hippich|2 years ago
nonethewiser|2 years ago
padolsey|2 years ago
MetaWhirledPeas|2 years ago
KMag|2 years ago
The returns supposedly track the short end of the yield curve on US Treasuries. That would make sense, as theoretically, the net premium of a box spread is equal to the net present value of the payout (under the no arbitrage assumption). That net present value should be very close to the yield on a zero-risk asset over the same time period. They're using 1 to 3 month options, so in theory, they get yield close to short-term US Treasuries (the market prices a near-zero probability of the US defaulting on its bonds in the next few months).
I haven't looked into the tracking error between SPY box spreads and the short end of the US yield curve. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_spread#cite_note-2 says the yield averages about 0.35% above holding equivalent maturity US Treasuries.
Though, it sounds like they're using box spreads composed of American options, so I wonder how they deal with early exercise risk. You only get bond-like performance from a box spread if you don't have early-exercise risk. The further out of the money they place their strikes in the box spread to avoid early exercise risk, the lower the liquidity they get, and higher trading costs.
The tax trick is that they also enter into a delta-neutral trade on a high-value single stock. (They don't use and index for this part because they want the difference between the winning and losing parts of this trade to be as large as possible, so they want volatility in the underlying asset.) At certain points, they realize the losses on the losing half of that trade (reducing tax liability), and perform a tax-free in-kind exchange of units (shares) in their ETF for the winning half of that trade. Of course, they don't know in advance which half will win and which will lose, but it doesn't matter. The brokerage buying their ETF in order to make the tax-free exchange bumps up the price of the ETF, very close to the value of the winning leg of the tax-saving trade.
Note the several caveats above (and probably some I missed) in comparing with US Treasuries yield.
This is not investment or tax advice.
_ink_|2 years ago
andrewla|2 years ago
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-02-22/put-th...
teeray|2 years ago
What about FDIC?
hatch7|2 years ago
[deleted]
empathy_m|2 years ago
The section 1256 tax treatment is especially cool not so much because of the 60/40 taxation but because if you have several consecutive years of 60/40 gains you can edit your past year's income by incurring a current year loss and having a carryback loss.
vamega|2 years ago
There's a long thread on the Bogleheads forums about Box Spreads here: https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=344667
4star3star|2 years ago
bombcar|2 years ago
andrewla|2 years ago