top | item 39481146 (no title) hatch7 | 2 years ago [flagged] discuss order hn newest aaomidi|2 years ago My dude the feds have consistently bailed out more than the minimums.If FDIC ever fails, then these ETFs are likely to crash with them due to the sheer “wtf” moment that would be. TMWNN|2 years ago >My dude the feds have consistently bailed out more than the minimums.You mean "maximums".And, no, that's not true. IndyMac customers got back about 50 cents on the dollar for non-insured deposits.The typical non-insured depositor in post-2008 bank failures (all tiny, until SVB and Signature) got about 75 cents on the dollar. load replies (2)
aaomidi|2 years ago My dude the feds have consistently bailed out more than the minimums.If FDIC ever fails, then these ETFs are likely to crash with them due to the sheer “wtf” moment that would be. TMWNN|2 years ago >My dude the feds have consistently bailed out more than the minimums.You mean "maximums".And, no, that's not true. IndyMac customers got back about 50 cents on the dollar for non-insured deposits.The typical non-insured depositor in post-2008 bank failures (all tiny, until SVB and Signature) got about 75 cents on the dollar. load replies (2)
TMWNN|2 years ago >My dude the feds have consistently bailed out more than the minimums.You mean "maximums".And, no, that's not true. IndyMac customers got back about 50 cents on the dollar for non-insured deposits.The typical non-insured depositor in post-2008 bank failures (all tiny, until SVB and Signature) got about 75 cents on the dollar. load replies (2)
aaomidi|2 years ago
If FDIC ever fails, then these ETFs are likely to crash with them due to the sheer “wtf” moment that would be.
TMWNN|2 years ago
You mean "maximums".
And, no, that's not true. IndyMac customers got back about 50 cents on the dollar for non-insured deposits.
The typical non-insured depositor in post-2008 bank failures (all tiny, until SVB and Signature) got about 75 cents on the dollar.