top | item 39483989

(no title)

khnov | 2 years ago

It is opensource but still costs nearly 25k dollar. why is it that expensive ?

discuss

order

TaylorAlexander|2 years ago

It’s a low volume product that has to support the salaries of the engineers who create and maintain the product.

syedkarim|2 years ago

I’m always surprised by how difficult it is for people to understand this.

claytonwramsey|2 years ago

By robot standards, $25k is not a bad. Most mobile-manipulator robots cost 5 digits or more, mostly due to the small market, high materials and engineering cost, and general headaches of robot building.

kscottz|2 years ago

Since when does open source mean cheap?

Labor isn't free. Building custom PCBs and hardware in low quantity isn't cheap. Building, calibrating, and testing robots isn't cheap.

yjftsjthsd-h|2 years ago

Now in all fairness, open source tends to mean cheaper because it does reduce how much has to be invented in-house, and also (sometimes) because it lets you crowd source free labor. In software, that can lead to stuff getting completely built for free (or close) because the base costs are low and mostly consist of labor that some people might be willing to do for free. In hardware, it's likely that open source still reduces the costs, but... you can make a thousand copies of a library for free; making a thousand copies of a part is never going to be free.

tekknik|2 years ago

I’ve been getting back into robotics lately and one thing that’s rubbing me the wrong way is these days, with PCB way, everybody seems to be making their own boards. Why? Some boards are innovative, but how come everybody needs their own FOC controller? Can we get one project going and focus on that before adding yet another FOC controller, but this time with wireless!

RIMR|2 years ago

The software is open source. The hardware is proprietary and protected by patents.

dheera|2 years ago

I don't think patents are what is making this specific hardware expensive. Rather it's just a lack of market and supply chain scaling.