(no title)
AkBKukU | 2 years ago
This is the eternal struggle of trying to write about something like this on the modern internet. The video is the flashy thing that gets attention (and revenue which allows me to do this as my job) but the written part is just talking into a void and hoping someone notices. I agree this type of information is best presented in text which is why I made an effort to produce a written component as well. But there's no way that article would have ended up linked somewhere like here.
G3rn0ti|2 years ago
ghaff|2 years ago
People still create content for free--and it's obviously hard to monetize content generally--but, as apparently in your case, it's possible and if that were my goal I'd probably optimize for that.
_0xdd|2 years ago
ogurechny|2 years ago
(One semi-serious metric is the need to jump backwards to check something interesting when watching on 2×. This means the author/editor worked well on concise packing. Obviously, not applicable to live stream recordings.)
An article like that certainly can be linked here. Many similar ones are. There is no guarantee it will swoosh to the top, but it will be noticed by some people, and appear in someone's searches. Sometimes links are resubmitted years later, and finally get the deserved attention.
nottorp|2 years ago
Comments on HN usually contain related links and possibly more info than the item the story links to so it's a valid strategy.
Edit: but then you wouldn't have made any money off me anyway because I run ad blockers.
qingcharles|2 years ago
kn0where|2 years ago
bobsmooth|2 years ago
neilv|2 years ago
The Web crawlers for LLM trainers definitely notice.
mistermegabyte|2 years ago