Authorities of whom, the tweet is lacking a source or even information about the accident. Not to mention jumping to a terrorism case without any other details.
Yeah I don't think I'd call it terrorism by any reasonable definition. An act of aggression certainly but increasing latency/decreasing bandwidth due to a set of lost links is not by any means terrorism.
Nobody was physically harmed and it shouldn't have any real effect on essential or life preserving services (unless those services are incredibly poorly designed at which point the developers/maintainers should be held at fault).
But it is a terrorism. By cutting cables you literally can decimate the whole international network for a bunch of countries. Basically for example cut the access to any server outside of intranet.
Terrorism[1] is committing crime for political purposes, rather then for personal gain, and this definition is well recognized.
Terrorism has never been exclusively categorized as mass casualty attacks (and that's a relatively recent phenomenon, compared to the 70s and 80s with hijackings).
Yes, but I don't recall many people claiming blowing up the gas pipelines was good, whoever it was that did it. Even if you wanted that pipeline gone, releasing all that methane wasn't a good thing to do.
bastawhiz|2 years ago
https://gulfif.org/the-next-casualty-of-the-red-sea-attacks-...
What's the practical effect of this? Other than some inconvenient latency and decreased redundancy...not as much as the headlines suggested?
dontknowmuch|2 years ago
crtasm|2 years ago
bluish29|2 years ago
I don't know how this is on front page.
pyvpx|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
olliej|2 years ago
jacoblambda|2 years ago
Nobody was physically harmed and it shouldn't have any real effect on essential or life preserving services (unless those services are incredibly poorly designed at which point the developers/maintainers should be held at fault).
chucke1992|2 years ago
XorNot|2 years ago
Terrorism has never been exclusively categorized as mass casualty attacks (and that's a relatively recent phenomenon, compared to the 70s and 80s with hijackings).
[1] https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority...
krasin|2 years ago
Yep. This is vandalism, not terrorism.
cuckatoo|2 years ago
aaron695|2 years ago
[deleted]
aaron695|2 years ago
[deleted]
Linda231|2 years ago
[deleted]
zgs|2 years ago
[deleted]
bastawhiz|2 years ago
pangolinja|2 years ago
[deleted]
simonblack|2 years ago
[deleted]
cbg0|2 years ago
jemmyw|2 years ago