(no title)
grey_earthling | 2 years ago
And the model where some patrons receive a reward encourages transactionalism and disappointed patrons when they don't get the reward they expected.
Liberapay's model seems much more sustainable - donations only, no rewards; Liberapay fund themselves via Liberapay because they actually believe their system works.
johnnyanmac|2 years ago
As in they are also funded by donations, or do the creators themselves pay for entry?
grey_earthling|2 years ago
> How is Liberapay funded? Are there fees?
> Liberapay does not take a cut of payments, the service is funded by the donations to its own account. However there are payment processing fees.
https://liberapay.com/about/faq
fleg|2 years ago
egypturnash|2 years ago
cma|2 years ago
zrn900|2 years ago
Huh? So does Paypal by taking a cut of payments. It does not work by people donating to Paypal. Does that mean Paypal doesnt work? The proposition does not make sense...
cruano|2 years ago
More than that, I don't think Patreons will ever be able to compete in a world where Netflix/Max/Disney exists just by making content. For example, if you consider the $10 tier of The Command Zone[1], you'd have to weight that in against something like the Disney+ catalog, which I think is even cheaper and definitely has a lot more content?
[1] https://www.patreon.com/commandzone