Hammers are used for theft, as well. Even if Nintendo's business would benefit from emulators not existing[1], it doesn't mean we should ban emulators (or create laws which allow multinationals to sue open source emulator projects out of existence).[1] which is not necessarily true
jamesear|2 years ago
For some people, if a tool has a single legitimate user, and otherwise haa illegitimate users, then the tool should be allowed.
For others, if the tool is mostly used for illegitimate means, then the tool should be banned.
Where the law lands in this case will be partly based on these values, and the benefits/harms to all parties.
I don't know enough about the case, but I don't think it's as clear cut as a hammer.
huggingmouth|2 years ago
The same can be said for gun use (not ownership).
How much something is used for illegal activities should have no baring on whether it is allowed in a free country.
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]