(no title)
atomicUpdate | 2 years ago
My reaction when I hear this is that those people are being paid entirely too much money if an LLM can do their job. I think this is where the real economic impact will come from: when managers realize it's just LLMs generating emails to be summarized by LLMs and it's just bots spamming each other with busy work all day. At some point companies will realize it's all pointless and start trimming these pointless jobs, leaving a lot of people without any actual skills.
hn_throwaway_99|2 years ago
That feels like such an unnecessarily cynical view to me. First, parent comment didn't say they are using LLMs to "do their jobs". Frankly, I feel that if you're a knowledge worker and aren't using LLMs at least part of the time, you're likely being inefficient. E.g. LLMs don't replace my skill as a software developer, but they sure make it faster to learn new libraries/technologies faster.
dartos|2 years ago
I like that it can figure out my boilerplate, but I wouldn’t trust any info it spits out.
randomdata|2 years ago
Not the greatest example. LLMs fundamentally cannot replace software developers. At the end of the day an LLM is just an interpreter, much like python, but using a different programming language. Any input to an LLM is developing software.
Perhaps the previous comment would be more understandable if phrased as:
"My reaction when I hear this is that those people are being paid entirely too much money if software developers can do their job."