top | item 39558609

(no title)

jcoder | 2 years ago

Why a xitter post of a screenshot with no link when the full article is public? https://support.docusign.com/s/document-item?language=en_US&...

discuss

NewJazz|2 years ago

Because that article is published by docusign and they could change it.

ehPReth|2 years ago

https://web.archive.org (take a screenshot option if you have a login and it's JS madness WBM can't handle), https://archive.ph, etc (hopefully captured more than one if possible) - random screenshots are proof of absolutely nothing.

(here's one for the page above: https://archive.is/e6K4K)

DistractionRect|2 years ago

In that case a link to an archived copy is preferable to a screenshot of the partial document hosted by Twitter.

ankit219|2 years ago

Because twitter downranks any tweet with link, so now users put a pic/screenshot in first tweet with the link in the next tweet.

silok|2 years ago

Also because xitter provides a broader discussion platform and reach compared to only HN (even though I highly appreciate the HN content). But yeah, the xitter post should preferably also contain that url to the source.