top | item 39563305

Show HN: Replay your typing in a few lines of JavaScript

82 points| Einenlum | 2 years ago |einenlum.github.io

I recently needed to make a text appear on a website and I wanted to get this real human feeling that computers don't have. I only found the TypeIt lib but it was not free and I didn't want to add a dependency for such a simple case.

Human replay allows to copy paste a few lines of JS to make a text appear exactly how you typed it.

36 comments

order
[+] OmarShehata|2 years ago|reply
This is great!

I was just talking to a coworker today about "libraries" vs "templates". You could have made this a library, but I think it's actually way nicer for it to be code I can copy/paste, so I can integrate it however I want. Some things are better as templates that I can copy.

If I have a weird use case or want to integrate it deeply into something else, the library doesn't need to accommodate that.

(the tradeoff of course is, if you update the library, my copied code won't update, so obviously this doesn't work for everything, but I think it works for some things!)

[+] jmkni|2 years ago|reply
Very clever, I can imagine a chat app where you see the message how it was typed before seeing the final message sent, could be novel
[+] Einenlum|2 years ago|reply
Oh, I had not thought about this. Cool idea!
[+] darkest_ruby|2 years ago|reply
What is everyone excited about? A mediocre piece of code that actually hardcodes th string? Same could be achieved with generic code with 2 Parms - a string, and duration
[+] onion2k|2 years ago|reply
If you want to focus on code maintainability of your web app then you're right - a generalized library with a simple API is the way to go.

On the other hand though, if you want to deliver the minimum code to the user to optimize for download speed, parsing time, and efficiency then a code generator that outputs some 'hardcoded' JS that you drop into the page is the way to go. I really like this approach and I've written plenty of generator functions like this in the past. It's more user-focused than importing a library to the same job.

This is one of the decisions every web dev has to make for themselves. Ideally when a site calls for a tiny function for an effect like this they'll opt for some 'bad' code that results in a better user experience.

[+] sonofhans|2 years ago|reply
This is nice.

I’m curious — it looks like you’re storing the full text string along with the timestamp. At first I thought you were capturing keystrokes, but it makes more sense to capture the full text, so you can allow people to edit with mouse/arrow keys, etc.

It will fall over at some point though, right? If you work on this more, is the next logical step to store a diff with each timestamp, rather than the full string?

[+] Einenlum|2 years ago|reply
Thanks, this is an interesting point. Storing the full message indeed has a downside in terms of storage (but for a short text it should be unnoticeable). I guess it also brings something positive: you can select the whole text, delete it, and start again, and the whole action should be stored. Making a diff to represent this is way more complicated.

I'll still think about this though. I think I could find a way to reduce the data size for most use cases.

[+] seafoamteal|2 years ago|reply
That's what I was thinking as well. I loved the demo, but was a bit surprised at how much redundant data was stored behind the scenes.

Capturing keystrokes could still be a viable option if you maintained something like a virtual cursor that could move around the text display area.

Or of course, diffs are the most straightforward way to do it.

[+] Einenlum|2 years ago|reply
I changed the code to add a diff. Thanks for your input! (pun intended)
[+] mosselman|2 years ago|reply
While we are on the subject: what does chatgpt use for the typing effect they have?

I know a stream of diffs comes in, but I think the animation is smoothened by something.

[+] blharr|2 years ago|reply
I don't think it does any other processing honestly, it might have a slight delay added in on each token, but it's pretty close to just streaming the output
[+] Einenlum|2 years ago|reply
Update: I first had a naive approach and stored the full content of the text on each stroke. I updated the code with some small algorithm to reduce data and avoid storing the full text when a character was added or removed.
[+] js4ever|2 years ago|reply
Amazing, I love how it's generating short js code and no library needed
[+] Einenlum|2 years ago|reply
Thanks! I appreciate. I indeed think for such short snippets, adding a dependency is unnecessary.
[+] t_zahil|2 years ago|reply
What a smart idea! I immediately sent it to my mom who has such a weird way of typing can't wait to see if the AI can reproduce it!
[+] avery17|2 years ago|reply
Hold backspace from the end until you erase everything. Start recording and hold down undo(ctrl-z). You're welcome.
[+] codetrotter|2 years ago|reply
It even captures changes made by iOS when auto correct changes the capitalization and spelling of words! :D
[+] anon115|2 years ago|reply
a web component in vanilla js would fit nice here
[+] Einenlum|2 years ago|reply
It has been added to the project.
[+] Einenlum|2 years ago|reply
Mmm interesting idea Gonna think about it
[+] amelius|2 years ago|reply
Why can I only replay once?
[+] Einenlum|2 years ago|reply
Oh, interesting point. I fixed this. Thanks!
[+] sourabhrathour|2 years ago|reply
exactly, there should have been to replay it for more number of times.