top | item 39605625 (no title) govg | 2 years ago There is no consistent scale on that graph, so any local maxima of reports received would look similar to any other. discuss order hn newest mankyd|2 years ago Exactly this. FB topped out around 520,000 reports. Google topped out around 1,400. That's a massive difference in scale.Both are above their baselines, but I bet some is just mis-reports, or increases in awareness due to more people checking in.Meta seems to be the only one really affected from what I can tell. jordanthoms|2 years ago We saw a big spike in latency and failures on the Google OAuth apis starting at the same time (15:21 UTC) NelsonMinar|2 years ago I made that same mistake after seeing someone post an unlabeled set of graphs to a Slack. The Google peak reported outages is about 0.25% of the Facebook peak. It seems reasonable some people just made a mistake.
mankyd|2 years ago Exactly this. FB topped out around 520,000 reports. Google topped out around 1,400. That's a massive difference in scale.Both are above their baselines, but I bet some is just mis-reports, or increases in awareness due to more people checking in.Meta seems to be the only one really affected from what I can tell. jordanthoms|2 years ago We saw a big spike in latency and failures on the Google OAuth apis starting at the same time (15:21 UTC)
jordanthoms|2 years ago We saw a big spike in latency and failures on the Google OAuth apis starting at the same time (15:21 UTC)
NelsonMinar|2 years ago I made that same mistake after seeing someone post an unlabeled set of graphs to a Slack. The Google peak reported outages is about 0.25% of the Facebook peak. It seems reasonable some people just made a mistake.
mankyd|2 years ago
Both are above their baselines, but I bet some is just mis-reports, or increases in awareness due to more people checking in.
Meta seems to be the only one really affected from what I can tell.
jordanthoms|2 years ago
NelsonMinar|2 years ago