[khokhol]

That "peace deal" would have required that Ukraine permanently recognize Russian sovereignty over Crimea and the Donbas (on top of other concessions).

This is why Russia is called "expansionist". Because it likes to expand its territory.

Before Boris arrived to scupper it.

That's not what happened. I know you read some snippet somewhere that made it sound like that's what happened. But simply put, you're being played. And that's not actually what happened.

[argentier]

Naftali Bennett (former Israeli premier): https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/current/russi...

Watch the interview if you don't like the source.

Ukrainian negotiator David Arahamiya: https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/official-john...

Video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lt4E0DiJts

More than snippets

[mopsi]

Every link of yours is a well-known spin. For example, Bennett has clarified that his words have been taken out of context and misrepresented, and Arahamiya has said that no-one on Ukrainian side belived that Russian peace plan was genuine and not a stalling tactic.

Perhaps it would be a good idea to switch to sites that don't have "conservative" in their URL.

[khokhol]

That's the spin of those two observers. But there was a lot to more to the actual chain of events at the time.

And lo and behold, the fact of two guys stating a certain narrative about those events (then embellished up a bit by the publications quoting them) does not make it so. Even the article you're citing about Arahamiya's version of events isn't so clear-cut about the matter (it says Boris's advice was but one factor among many) as you're making it out to be.