[pwb25]

yes, also javascript the good parts is really good(hehe) because it's more theoretical and there is not html or web stuff in it just the language

[TehShrike]

How recently have you read it? I thought it was a worthwhile read when I first read it 12 years ago, but I picked it up to skim a couple years ago and was struck with how much of it was irrelevant for modern JS due to changes in the language spec.

[vanderZwan]

In that sense an annotated "this is what JS used to be when this book first came out" version could be of historical interest.

[pwb25]

Last time was 2017 I think, don't know if there is a big difference I use both new and old things