[anonair]

Is there some legal or moral significance of underlining that the occupation is _temporary_ ? Is _permanent_ occupation somewhat more justified or what?

[fullspectrumdev]

It’s temporary because the occupiers are going to be sent home in bags if they don’t leave of their own accord.

Calling a place permanently occupied is pretty much the same as giving up on it.

[verticalscaler]

Military matters often have additional considerations to the legal and moral ones that preoccupy your mind. Hence there is, obviously, much significance.