[l2p]

Regarding your last point:

I used to also have this view, I changed my mind after realizing that driving a vehicle is one of the more dangerous things you do regularly. In fact, it is a leading cause of mortality for my demographic. Automobile safety has changed significantly in the last 10-20 years. In many newer automobiles, there are DIY ways to remove the 'phone home' capability if you so desire.

[JohnFen]

> Automobile safety has changed significantly in the last 10-20 years.

That's a valid point. Personally, I'd prefer to take the increased chance of being seriously injured or killed in an accident over being under constant surveillance. But this is a thing reasonable people can and do have different perspectives on.

[rokkitmensch]

I went off the edge of a forest road and head on into a tree in my 2022 Tacoma. Passenger and I both walked away with no injuries.

I have completely reevaluated my stance (was yours) after this experiment. I'll take the plastic car that explodes on contact if it saves my life.

[dzhiurgis]

> being under constant surveillance

Don your tinfoil hat sir. SAR sats can track cars already.

[jjav]

> Automobile safety has changed significantly in the last 10-20 years.

I think we need to define "safety". Leaking all my private information is a major safety threat. Only cars from the last 8-9 years have this risk (with some exception). So depending on what you think safety is, the most recent cars can be the least safe of them all.

In terms of mechanical safety, I wouldn't want to drive a car from the 50s. But a car from, say, 2005, is perfectly safe mechanically while also having zero data flow risks.

[patrick451]

I don't particularly care. I'd rather be at more risk and actually own the vehicle than subject myself to all of this silicon valley nanny-mode nonsense.