[PH95VuimJjqBqy]

it's not clear to me that you read or understood the article, all of your posts certainly feel as if you didn't.

He explained why 0 isn't the goal, you continue to act as if he didn't. I don't know where else this conversation can go without you going back and better understanding his actual point.

[saghm]

If the discussion requires that I find his explanation convincing rather than being able to think that it's not sufficient, then yeah, I guess there's nowhere else for it to go.