This was my initial reaction as well, but in these work environments record keeping is USUALLY extensive by design: parts, tools, even minor acts like tightening a screw or bolt is logged.
The fact that they can't reproduce _ANY_ records of this work, including who would've done the work, is suspicious.
Any HN'ers here have experience in these types of environments to either validate / refute?
According to other sources[0] Boeing says they retain surveillance footage for 30 days, and the accident was months after the work was done, so it would presumably have been overwritten before anyone knew it would matter. That being said, if you're going to use surveillance footage as a fallback to deal with missing documentation, then 30 days of retention is woefully innadequate.
I don't think Boeing is destroying evidence; they're just generally negligent about keeping accurate records in the first place. Boeing can't provide information that they never recorded.
Sheesh. Here I was thinking that Boeing's failures were "just" that they prioritize profits over good engineering practices and safety. But between the whistleblower's death and now this, things are looking more nefarious than I would have suspected.
[+] [-] seo-speedwagon|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dvno42|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] s3r3nity|2 years ago|reply
The fact that they can't reproduce _ANY_ records of this work, including who would've done the work, is suspicious.
Any HN'ers here have experience in these types of environments to either validate / refute?
[+] [-] jjk166|2 years ago|reply
[0] https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/boeing-security-footage-...
[+] [-] jprd|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] seo-speedwagon|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wmf|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JohnFen|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sydbarrett74|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ado__dev|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] AndrewKemendo|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dboreham|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]