[vinner_roy]

Could you use Aurora Limitless for this instead? https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2023/11/amazon-au...

[bearjaws]

I doubt even VC money can afford this service.

Serverless Aurora is incredibly expensive for most workloads. I have yet to find a use case for any SaaS product that is used >4 hours a day. Since all my products span at least 3 time zones there is at least 12 hours of activity a day.

[Scubabear68]

We found this out the hard way in a small startup. The per query and I/O expense was through the roof.

[brcmthrowaway]

What products

[paulddraper]

"Limitless" refers to the bill, not just the scale.

[sgarland]

At my company, we were given an early talk on Limitless. Never once did the reps mention that it ran on Serverless. Dear lord, that's going to be a hard no from me. Unless they've dramatically changed pricing for Limitless as opposed to normal Serverless, that'll be through the roof.

[vinner_roy]

Haha alright I get the picture. Too expensive.

[MapleWalnut]

Yes, but that wasn't available when they did this migration

[jamesfinlayson]

Hm, looks like it's only available as a preview too. I was wondering why I hadn't seen in mentioned before.