top | item 39729722

(no title)

reidacdc | 1 year ago

I noticed that too.

I was also surprised that they called out the complexity of EV drivetrains (and charging systems, but I don't know anything about those) as a factor. My prior understanding was that EV drivetrains are significantly simpler than ICE ones, the number of moving parts is comparatively low for EVs, and you don't have the large temperature gradients and intense mechanical impulses that come from repeatedly igniting fuel/air mixtures.

I don't dispute the empirical claims, but as the parent comment implies, I think this is mostly about the maturity of the repair ecosystem, and it's reasonable to expect that that will improve as EVs become more prevalent. It's not a reason to stop, it's a reason to keep going.

discuss

order

wakawaka28|1 year ago

At least theoretically, EV drive trains should be more durable than their gasoline counterparts. But the batteries are the weak point. Nobody is making modular batteries that can be easily diagnosed and swapped, and those batteries are essentially incendiary devices that even an expert cannot assess. It's an opaque canister of chemicals that could be damaged internally without anyone being aware. External damage almost always causes spectacular fires that can't be extinguished. If you have an EV and get in a wreck, GTFO as soon as you can, especially if there are any fumes in sight.