top | item 39793265 (no title) jawmes8 | 1 year ago I usually look for duplicate issues that aren’t being addressed, or if there’s just a lot of seemingly non-trivial ones that go unanswered discuss order hn newest sph|1 year ago For me the presence of a stale bot that automatically closes issues after 30 days - like Bulma - is a major red flag.Sweeping issues under the carpet actively makes your library worse, only because one really values the vanity metric of "closed/open issue ratio".Github star count is another useless metric, often inflated by "star this on github" widgets on the homepage. Uehreka|1 year ago I wish the auto-close bot could be considered a red flag for the exact reasons you stated, but unfortunately it’s in effect on tons of actually good projects, so it’s not useful as a signal.
sph|1 year ago For me the presence of a stale bot that automatically closes issues after 30 days - like Bulma - is a major red flag.Sweeping issues under the carpet actively makes your library worse, only because one really values the vanity metric of "closed/open issue ratio".Github star count is another useless metric, often inflated by "star this on github" widgets on the homepage. Uehreka|1 year ago I wish the auto-close bot could be considered a red flag for the exact reasons you stated, but unfortunately it’s in effect on tons of actually good projects, so it’s not useful as a signal.
Uehreka|1 year ago I wish the auto-close bot could be considered a red flag for the exact reasons you stated, but unfortunately it’s in effect on tons of actually good projects, so it’s not useful as a signal.
sph|1 year ago
Sweeping issues under the carpet actively makes your library worse, only because one really values the vanity metric of "closed/open issue ratio".
Github star count is another useless metric, often inflated by "star this on github" widgets on the homepage.
Uehreka|1 year ago