(no title)
OrwellianChild | 1 year ago
Boom would probably be the primary beneficiary of such an engine existing, so it isn't all that surprising that they will have to fund the development. The second supersonic airframe that can use their engine would be the one to turn that R&D profitable for Boom (and ease the introduction of more supersonic airframe options).
class3shock|1 year ago
Where I would disagree is that Boom can make it work. The amount of specialized knowledge you need in design and analysis as well as test and manufacturing facilities makes it near impossible for an outsider get in the game. Which is why there aren't any in the commercial jet engine space. GE, PW, RR and I guess Safran is pretty much it. You can't just decide you are going to do the R&D yourself and pop out a new engine in 5 years.
imron|1 year ago
Plenty of people discounted them at the time too.
I’m not saying Boom will succeed, but it’s not outside the realm of possibility if they can dedicate themselves to task the same way SpaceX did.
ks1723|1 year ago
Honda did develop their HF118 turbofan engine apparently from scratch, but it took about 8 years [1]. And for the actual commercialization they teamed up with GE and then it took another 10 years until certification of the successor HF120 [2].
[1] scroll down on https://global.honda/en/tech/eVTOL_gas_turbine_hybrid_system...
[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GE_Honda_HF120
Turing_Machine|1 year ago
Honeywell Aerospace, Williams International, United Engine Corporation, and AVIC are some others.
There are more than you might think.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Gas_turbine_manufactu...
Not all of these make aircraft engines, of course, but a fair number of them do.
ethbr1|1 year ago
aeyes|1 year ago
twobitshifter|1 year ago