[falserum]

Is that actually sketchy though?

- Each artist has different royalties, some are more expensive than others.

- appearantly people do listen to ”cheaper” artists, in right circumstances

- consumers prefer that cost of subscription would be lower

- I assume scenario in the article saves money for spotify, and in turn allows to remain profitable without increasing subscription prices.

Seems it aligns well with interest of consumers in the long run.

[sverhagen]

Some transparency around it would be nice, without the need for investigative journalism.

[falserum]

Can’t argue on that. More transparency is always good for end user.