[tshell]

I understand that that perspective might be prevalent here on HN. But really, let's try to understand the target market of this theoretical iMessage Android client. It's specifically for folks who:

1. Are committed to only using Android phones (i.e. can't be convinced to get an iPhone).

2. Communicate (or are forced to communicate) over the default messaging experience with primarily iPhone users (remembering that the iMessage / SMS default is mostly just a U.S.-centric thing and cuts out most of the rest of the world).

3. Are willing and able to download a third-party messaging app to address this specific use-case.

[vel0city]

So the market is for people who are:

1. Android Users

2. Probably in the US

3. Who communicate with iPhone users

4. Are willing to download chat apps

Do you think this is an incredibly rare group of people? Android has ~40% market share in the US, so there's a lot of Android users out there. It seems extremely likely for an Android user to have some iPhone users they communicate with. And at least in my experiences, people with Android devices are generally willing to install 3rd party chat apps given how terrible Google has been with really making a solid single chat platform for Android. The kind of people who aren't willing to install some chat app are more likely to be iPhone users, given the default chat options on Android are highly fragmented you pretty much need a third-party app to have a decent chat experience.

[tshell]

My real-world experience with folks on Android is in two categories:

1. They're proud of the fact that they're not a "blue-bubble Apple sheep" and would find downloading Apple's messaging app as an admission of defeat.

2. They literally just do not care in any way whatsoever and just use whatever the default client is (e.g. grandparents).

I'm entirely willing to admit this may not be representative, however.