(no title)
_rend | 1 year ago
My dad is an on-call doctor; getting to his hospital by car takes ~15 minutes, but ~60–90 via public transit. His patients don't have the luxury of waiting for him to take the bus. His hospital is outside of this zone, but I imagine that paying $15 every time he got called in would be extraordinarily frustrating.
My mom does work within this zone, also in places not easily reachable by public transit. I suspect that she, like many others, will still commute into Manhattan, park in areas outside of the zone, then take public transit into it — which will increase congestion in those areas. It'll be interesting to watch for the lead-on effects.
I sympathize entirely with the desire to reduce traffic in the city, but man, for people who live far from work and can't easily commute any other way, what a pain.
wnolens|1 year ago
Presuming that it will be implemented like every other road toll, it will be auto-paid without noticing, too.
mtalantikite|1 year ago
_rend|1 year ago
Not all doctors make enough money to not notice it, especially ones earlier in their career.
Regardless, assuming you have two working adults each paying the $15 toll once a day, conservatively, working 250 days a year, that's $7,500/year that has to come from somewhere. I can't imagine an income level (even if it doesn't affect your quality of life) where that's not an insanely frustrating amount to pay… to the MTA of all places. That money getting reinvested into useful infrastructure would be a dream come true!
conjecTech|1 year ago
AlwaysRock|1 year ago
Can likely afford the expense: check Prefers/needs to get into the city faster than public transport allows for: check
The article says they expect traffic entering the city to fall by 17%. You dad is part of the 83% of people who will say the pain of paying another toll is lower than the pain of taking public transit.
polygamous_bat|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
rsanek|1 year ago
himinlomax|1 year ago