top | item 3986716

Still Smiling, Eduardo? USA Want To Collect Your $67M In Facebook Taxes Anyway

8 points| kondro | 14 years ago |techcrunch.com | reply

14 comments

order
[+] mindcrime|14 years ago|reply
On top of that, they want to make it official that people who do avoid paying their taxes by renouncing citizenship are unable from ever re-entering the country again.

That is so braindead, it's not even wrong. You'd be hard-put to come up with a worse policy if you were actively trying.

Well, Schumer (D-NY) and Casey (D-PA) are mad as hell and they’re not going to take it anymore. They will call Saverin’s $67 million tax “duck” an “outrage” today in their press conference when they detail the rest of the Ex-Patriot act.

The "outrage" is these dipshit politicians and their big-spending government and their obsessive desire to steal every cent they can from the rest of us.

[+] herpderp|14 years ago|reply
What this law will effectively do is provide a huge incentive for foreigners who earn money in the states never to become US citizens.
[+] rbanffy|14 years ago|reply
That's interesting. Someone who was born in country A and is a citizen of country B and decided to live in country C, no longer wants to be a citizen of B (which would be understandable for a lot of reasons, taxes being only one of many) still has to pay taxes as if he/she were actually using country B's tax-funded services.
[+] dguaraglia|14 years ago|reply
Even worse: someone who was born in country B and lived his whole life outside of country B, still needs to file taxes and pay social security every year as if he was living in country B.

That's my particular case.

[+] eblackburn|14 years ago|reply
Banning wealthy entrepreneurial investors from your country would surely be counter-productive to stimulating growth?
[+] rbanffy|14 years ago|reply
An interesting question is what happens when you renounce citizenship for political reasons (for this exercise, consider someone who fundamentally disagrees with the current employment of military force). Shouldn't this rule, one that effectively punishes such forms of protest, go against the 1st amendment?
[+] rsanchez1|14 years ago|reply
Good luck getting this government to consider the Constitutionality of any bill (or executive order, for that matter) they pass.
[+] pan69|14 years ago|reply
It's nationalism. Very scary.

So, the government decides to give tax breaks to the rich. Not much you and I can do about that. It's hard fighting the system, you can camp out in Wall st all you want.

So lets single out this one guy and crucify him, make him an example of what we do with expats who don't pay their due.

[+] gsb|14 years ago|reply
The wall is going up one brick at a time...
[+] jack-r-abbit|14 years ago|reply
So... we have rules about who pays what taxes! Oh... you mean you are obeying those rules? Well then... we will change those rules! lame
[+] rsanchez1|14 years ago|reply
Singapore is smarter about its tax policy than the US, more so if Schumer and Casey succeed in making their absurd proposal law.

How are these people even in the Senate anyway, much less re-elected each term?