top | item 39890243 (no title) LettuceSand12 | 1 year ago A lisp that didn’t spam parentheses would probably be more palatable. discuss order hn newest FredrikMeyer|1 year ago Classic counter-answer: Javascript: f(x). Lisp: (f x).Javascript: f(g(x)) Lisp: (f (g x))Same amount of parens. Timwi|1 year ago This is called “proof by example” and is a fallacy.Show me how to write `a + b * c` in Lisp without parentheses. load replies (1) cess11|1 year ago It's not uncommon in the Lisp-family that you can use [] as well as () so that problem of yours is solved already. solanav|1 year ago Check out Julia (https://discourse.julialang.org/t/about-julia-and-lisp/25119)
FredrikMeyer|1 year ago Classic counter-answer: Javascript: f(x). Lisp: (f x).Javascript: f(g(x)) Lisp: (f (g x))Same amount of parens. Timwi|1 year ago This is called “proof by example” and is a fallacy.Show me how to write `a + b * c` in Lisp without parentheses. load replies (1)
Timwi|1 year ago This is called “proof by example” and is a fallacy.Show me how to write `a + b * c` in Lisp without parentheses. load replies (1)
cess11|1 year ago It's not uncommon in the Lisp-family that you can use [] as well as () so that problem of yours is solved already.
FredrikMeyer|1 year ago
Javascript: f(g(x)) Lisp: (f (g x))
Same amount of parens.
Timwi|1 year ago
Show me how to write `a + b * c` in Lisp without parentheses.
cess11|1 year ago
solanav|1 year ago