top | item 3995989

I don’t just refuse, I don’t tolerate a-holes fullstop

4 points| nullnullnull | 13 years ago |codingninja.co.uk

12 comments

order

jiggy2011|13 years ago

Problem is , how do you define an "asshole". I know a few people I consider complete a-holes but they seem to be very popular with everyone else.

Likewise I know a few people who are disliked because they have a number of weird personality traits but I don't take offense to them at all.

nullnullnull|13 years ago

I guess, it's subjective to a degree. There probably is a slight grey area. But on the whole, I think its the "generally" recognised a-holes. i.e. some-one most would describe as an a-hole.

factorial|13 years ago

This blog post is ludicrous. Seriously, how bloated does your head have to be to insert your own quotes in your blog articles? Check this out:

"There is nothing, in software engineering that can’t be done by other “non-genius” programmers. Further no one developer is greater than a community of developers. - Coding Ninja"

Are you so sure about it? A million mediocre mathematicians couldn't have achieved what Grigori Perelman did, and a million of mediocre developers couldn't have produced the tools we use nowadays. There is absolutely no evidence that a community of average guys could have come up with something like LIPS or Smalltalk. If you claim otherwise, then please mention ONE example. We're all standing on the shoulders of giants, and only a myopic cretin would deny the staggering impact they have on all our lives and our profession.

For further reading, dear OP, check out this post by Joel Spolsky: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/HighNotes.html

nullnullnull|13 years ago

The reason for the self quote, is because the block quote only has one style on that theme. Thus in the past readers have been confused between external quotes and internal quotes. That is the reason (as a means of reference).

Secondly, the example you gave is about mathematics. In that context I agree. But in the context of software programming this is not the the same. The statement stands.