(no title)
neysofu | 1 year ago
Needless to say, no one likes this idea because it throws out of the window centuries of game theory. Endgames would be completely different. I'm not convinced it would be a less interesting game, though.
neysofu | 1 year ago
Needless to say, no one likes this idea because it throws out of the window centuries of game theory. Endgames would be completely different. I'm not convinced it would be a less interesting game, though.
wh0knows|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
btilly|1 year ago
Some positions simply do not allow for a win. Yes, you could say do it on time. But then it becomes about mechanical dexterity as people try to be faster than their opponent in a pointless piece shuffle.
neysofu|1 year ago
BurningFrog|1 year ago
For example a King vs King endgame. Even really weak players will never accidentally put their king next to the opponent.
debugnik|1 year ago
kgabis|1 year ago
acchow|1 year ago
These are the same.
neysofu|1 year ago
whimsicalism|1 year ago
thom|1 year ago
paulddraper|1 year ago
(Which affects some draws but not most.)