(no title)
epups
|
1 year ago
If it's not about percentages, then what's the difference here? Walmart and Amazon are not fundamentally different. If the Apple Store can be compared to a mall, then we are in the same economic model we've been for decades.
ilayn|1 year ago
With Amazon, if you have a conflict, you are done. You cannot come back to the mall. And there is a single (or very few malls).
In other words, it is not a market, where people come together for business) anymore it is being bound to a higher power to grant you rights of doing business.
epups|1 year ago
All of the replies here seem to point out that monopolies are bad and tech companies tend to be monopolistic. This is obvious and we all agree. However, when asked what is the difference between a mall and Apple Store, Varoufakis did not mention a monopoly or oligopoly as the issue, he mentioned rent. Specifically he mentioned that getting a percentage of profit was the biggest issue. I think this is not a strong argument for calling it a new economic model.
darkwater|1 year ago
dzonga|1 year ago
on amazon / google etc with their algorithm certain shops / websites are blocked from you ever noticing they exist due to their algorithms.
bluetomcat|1 year ago
vladms|1 year ago
> offering a particular subset to a particular customer
Aren't those in fact the same?... It's just that you can adjust faster and more granular, but as you yourself mentioned it happened before as well.
And really everybody talks about "the evil fine tuned algorithm" but when I am looking for something to buy many times those "smart" algorithms make very stupid suggestions and I feel the same as in the supermarket - I need to be very very specific about what I want and look for myself otherwise I don't get it.
jahnu|1 year ago