Headline is a just a teensy bit more “correlation IS causation, actuallly” than the actual paper, which bends over backwards to avoid claiming that mRNA vaccines are causing heart complications in anyone at all.
Now, it does a pretty decent job of establishing its own methodological weaknesses, and someone else may be much better at interpreting stats than me, but something certainly seems off when only 218 members of the survey group reported having a cardiac complication and 366 reported neutral belief that the cardiac complication they had experienced was caused by the virus… when the clear majority of the cohort had no cardiac complications at all the lack of a N/A box on that question really skews the results.
Also given how many people in that population already had diagnosed hypertension, what are the odds that they would have had such a complication even without the vaccine?
yawpitch|1 year ago
Now, it does a pretty decent job of establishing its own methodological weaknesses, and someone else may be much better at interpreting stats than me, but something certainly seems off when only 218 members of the survey group reported having a cardiac complication and 366 reported neutral belief that the cardiac complication they had experienced was caused by the virus… when the clear majority of the cohort had no cardiac complications at all the lack of a N/A box on that question really skews the results.
Also given how many people in that population already had diagnosed hypertension, what are the odds that they would have had such a complication even without the vaccine?