> the systems don’t have a path to profitable functionality.
I don’t buy this at all.
Sure loads of ChatGPT wrappers will die but there is definitely money to be made. Robotics is going to be big. Companies are firing customer service people. Etc
Sure that last one is perhaps not desirable but it does prove both practical value and feasibility
And as the price per token plummets and context increases more application will open up.
Just because VC money is keeping some shops open that should die doesn’t mean that’s true for the entire field
AI customer service chatbots are just as prone to hallucination as any other AI chatbot, and companies are finding out that they're liable when their AIs lie to their customers. As we see more companies replacing humans with AIs, we're going to start to see more companies being found liable for the claims that their AIs spun out of whole cloth.
We haven't seen an AI yet which can consistently reproduce the truth, rather than something that sounds a lot like something that could be the truth. When someone makes an AI which is reliably just a knowledge engine, which can take an input, process it, and accurately convey the knowledge available in that input, then that will be a killer app; when an AI can take a company's documentation and summarize and condense it for easier consumption, that AI will be insanely popular in business cases both internal and external. Until then, these customer-service-replacing AI chatbots are going to prove to be more and more of a maintenance and liability headache.
FTA "Unfortunately, the venture-capital-funded AI industry runs on the promise of replacing humans with a very large shell script — including in areas where details matter. If the AI’s output is just plausible nonsense, that’s a problem. So the hallucination issue is causing a slight panic among AI company leadership."
I mean... If the VC's start funding AI companies with crypto is it incest or cannibalism.
Can someone come up with an idea for computing that doesn't involve wasting electricity with GPU's on pictures of cats and dogs?
We are about to find out if the “bullshit jobs” theory was correct. I suspect it is, we could easily replace the flibbertigibbet class of agile project managers with 3 lines of bash (including comments) and my own manager is a poorly formed excel macro.
To be fair, it doesn't look like he was far off on crypto.
Of course being able to call that doesn't at all automatically translate into also being right about AI.
There's lots of people that have successfully predicted one particular bubble, but all of their other predictions have completely failed to materialize (to say nothing of all the wrong ones they made before striking gold). That's just how selection/survivorship bias works.
In this particular case, I actually suspect that both things can be true at the same time: We're in the middle of an AI hype bubble and >90% of current startups will not survive the next 3 years, but AI will still profoundly change the way we work.
There's even a nice historical analogy: We once had the dot com bubble, in which lots of people lost lots of money, but ultimately, the Internet did turn out to be kind of a big deal. It's just hard to go from that general bet on vibes to one that identifies actual companies that are going to bring about all of that.
I have yet to see a comment with a sarcastic "something bad" in it that provides an actual argument.
By the way, what positive effect has crypto had so far? Other than redistributing between some people and wasting enormous amounts of energy?
Personally I use AI all the time, but hallucinations are a problem, data is always a problem in all of machine learning, and it's always good to stay away from the cult-like behavior of people who can find absolutely nothing wrong with new technology.
Havoc|1 year ago
I don’t buy this at all.
Sure loads of ChatGPT wrappers will die but there is definitely money to be made. Robotics is going to be big. Companies are firing customer service people. Etc
Sure that last one is perhaps not desirable but it does prove both practical value and feasibility
And as the price per token plummets and context increases more application will open up.
Just because VC money is keeping some shops open that should die doesn’t mean that’s true for the entire field
danudey|1 year ago
And they're starting to reap the rewards:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisagarcia/2024/02/19/what-ai...
AI customer service chatbots are just as prone to hallucination as any other AI chatbot, and companies are finding out that they're liable when their AIs lie to their customers. As we see more companies replacing humans with AIs, we're going to start to see more companies being found liable for the claims that their AIs spun out of whole cloth.
We haven't seen an AI yet which can consistently reproduce the truth, rather than something that sounds a lot like something that could be the truth. When someone makes an AI which is reliably just a knowledge engine, which can take an input, process it, and accurately convey the knowledge available in that input, then that will be a killer app; when an AI can take a company's documentation and summarize and condense it for easier consumption, that AI will be insanely popular in business cases both internal and external. Until then, these customer-service-replacing AI chatbots are going to prove to be more and more of a maintenance and liability headache.
otabdeveloper4|1 year ago
You mean "sexbots"? Too niche and expensive. For industrial automation you don't need "AI".
> Companies are firing customer service people.
They don't need "AI" to do this.
zer00eyz|1 year ago
I mean... If the VC's start funding AI companies with crypto is it incest or cannibalism.
Can someone come up with an idea for computing that doesn't involve wasting electricity with GPU's on pictures of cats and dogs?
smackeyacky|1 year ago
bidder33|1 year ago
nothing new. https://pessimistsarchive.org/
lxgr|1 year ago
Of course being able to call that doesn't at all automatically translate into also being right about AI.
There's lots of people that have successfully predicted one particular bubble, but all of their other predictions have completely failed to materialize (to say nothing of all the wrong ones they made before striking gold). That's just how selection/survivorship bias works.
In this particular case, I actually suspect that both things can be true at the same time: We're in the middle of an AI hype bubble and >90% of current startups will not survive the next 3 years, but AI will still profoundly change the way we work.
There's even a nice historical analogy: We once had the dot com bubble, in which lots of people lost lots of money, but ultimately, the Internet did turn out to be kind of a big deal. It's just hard to go from that general bet on vibes to one that identifies actual companies that are going to bring about all of that.
Netcob|1 year ago
By the way, what positive effect has crypto had so far? Other than redistributing between some people and wasting enormous amounts of energy?
Personally I use AI all the time, but hallucinations are a problem, data is always a problem in all of machine learning, and it's always good to stay away from the cult-like behavior of people who can find absolutely nothing wrong with new technology.
__loam|1 year ago
otabdeveloper4|1 year ago
davidgerard|1 year ago
t3hfl1pside|1 year ago
[deleted]
Olesya000|1 year ago
[deleted]