The article rightly points out the industrial impact of more powerful and compact lasers but I cannot wait for those PCSELs to reach the small workshop market. Having a cheap laser able to cut metal at home / small shops would be so useful (And sneakily dangerous as lasers are).
nabilhat|1 year ago
The laser only melts the metal, it doesn't move it out of the cut, and some metals can react in plain air to sputter back at the emitter optics. Gas is forced under pressure at the cut to clear it. With some metals and/or thinner (speaking from a commercial perspective) stock, you can get away with plain air at high volumes of normal air compressor pressures with good results if it's very clean and dry. Others require specifically reactive or nonreactive gases or blends of gases. That's true for most hot cutting processes though. Plasma usually consumes plain air to blow out the cut, oxy-fuel uses excess oxygen to reactively blow out the cut. Lasers with their extremely narrow kerf are more finicky, which can mean a surprisingly high consumables cost.
More powerful lasers also require the optical hardware to operate in a light vacuum. Plasma generated by dust and air itself will ablate expensive parts. Home shops shouldn't need that much power though. If you're cutting thick or difficult metals regularly, that's not a hobby any more.
Then there's the byproducts. Organics get blasted into all kinds of random organic-ish things that aren't great to ingest or emit at ground level near neighbors (PSA, this is true for current hobby lasers). Cutting metals can get really exciting if you don't clean often and thoroughly enough to prevent a critical mass of finely powdered byproducts. An iron or aluminum fire will wreck your laser. An iron and aluminum fire will wreck your laser, and whatever it's sitting on, and the concrete below that.
phkahler|1 year ago
These seem safer. With a wide emission area and focusing lens, a reflected beam will weaken with distance.
TaylorAlexander|1 year ago
thesz|1 year ago
So, please do not come around these lasers with remaining eye unprotected.
I think one should work with these things only using some cameras and never directly.
Blackthorn|1 year ago
rozap|1 year ago
angra_mainyu|1 year ago
HeatrayEnjoyer|1 year ago
pureheartlover|1 year ago
bloggie|1 year ago
abakker|1 year ago
Everlast now has a laser welder, too.
I think it’s only a matter of time before we get cheaper cutter in the 1kw range.
TeMPOraL|1 year ago
codesnik|1 year ago
coder543|1 year ago
mft_|1 year ago
At the moment, there are expensive-but-affordable home CNC laser cutters, typically for a small number of thousand EUR/USD. The more powerful ones can do a very neat job cutting (up to a few mm of) plywood. There are also CNC plasma cutters, which do a good but slightly rough job of cutting sheet metal, and are relatuvely large and complex beasts. I guess a highly-powerful laser, of the type envisioned, would offer the best of all worlds: relatively neat and quick cutting of all materials on the same compact machine.
They might also replace handheld plasma cutters (and welders?) too.
detritus|1 year ago
If it can cut metal, it'd probably not suffer much in the way of limitations on other materials... .
hallway_monitor|1 year ago
sylware|1 year ago
TaylorAlexander|1 year ago
https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256804553731471.html
I have worked with several nicer fully enclosed models that do not have any monitoring camera. I have a similar model to this one with no such camera, and I suspect this one does not have one either:
https://omtechlaser.com/products/60w-co2-laser-engraver-with...
That said if a kilowatt metal cutting laser was for sale, I would suspect it would have a full enclosure at least.
dtgriscom|1 year ago
MarcScott|1 year ago
LLMs and self-driving cars mean that KITT from Knight Rider will finally become a reality.
All I need is for Webb to discover a planet a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far, away, and my childhood fictions will have been realised.
rohansingh|1 year ago