[zenexer]

This article makes several claims that are trivial to disprove:

> The 4TB capacity doubles that of the largest microSD cards, earning it the title for the world's largest removable memory card.

> CFexpress, known for its superior speed. Announced last year, the latest generation, CFexpress 4.0, supports up to four PCIe 4.0 lanes and 2GB/s per lane. Neither of those card formats can come close to offering 4TB of storage, however.

CFexpress cards are physically larger than SD cards and have no trouble squeezing in 4 TB. They're uncommon, but they do already exist: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1711327-REG/red_digit...

CFexpress is mostly just overpriced PCIe. You can make your own 4 TB CFexpress card with a small adapter and a 4 TB M.2 SSD that supports PCIe. It stands to reason that if there are 4 TB M.2 PCIe SSDs that are about the size of a CFexpress card, then there are also 4 TB CFexpress cards.

Does anyone have a better source?

[cyanydeez]

MicroSD is the operative word you missed.

[zenexer]

The sentence claims that this card is the world’s “largest removable memory card”—that’s false.

It then goes on to say it’s larger than any CFexpress card. Also false.

[whaleofatw2022]

Alas, the article itself is touting a normal SD card, so in a way it's a weird comparison in the first place...

[Mo3]

Yes, these RED cards basically just contain SSDs inside. However the title clearly says "SD"