(no title)
pentae | 1 year ago
The Ocean Cleanup themselves have estimated at least 75% of ocean trash is from fishing boats, and from living on a remote tropical island myself, at least 90% of the things you find washed up on the beach appear to be from Chinese fishing vessels. (there's usually Chinese characters on the bottles and plastic)
Imagine how much more cost effective it would be for these NGO's to lobby (bribe) politicians and the UN to require all fishing vessels to bring back their trash to port to be weighed and processed, their nets counted.
They say theres about 10 rivers in the world that contribute the remainder of the ocean plastic, so if they can put these recovery systems on those next then we're half way towards solving the problem
cdrini|1 year ago
There are NGOs working on legislation/lobbying fixes to the problem; eg Ocean Conservancy. But those changes will take a looooong time to get through the system. And regardless, there's already plastic in the oceans that will have to be cleaned up regardless, causing damage right now. So starting on the cleanup at the same time seems reasonable to me.
The ocean cleanup also funds various research initiatives -- like the numbers you mentioned -- which lobbyists can use to help change legislation.
cookingmyserver|1 year ago
They estimate that 75% of the ocean trash in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is from fishing boats.
paulsutter|1 year ago
fransje26|1 year ago
It's not called a bribed, it's called a secondary financial incentive..
8f2ab37a-ed6c|1 year ago
shuvuvt5|1 year ago
gosub100|1 year ago
doubloon|1 year ago
Workaccount2|1 year ago
Ignoring morals to lower costs is so plainly obvious as a way to increase profits that it is almost an insult to insinuate that any one group of people didn't think of it themselves.
NicoJuicy|1 year ago
Eight of them are in Asia: the Yangtze; Indus; Yellow; Hai He; Ganges; Pearl; Amur; Mekong; and two in Africa – the Nile and the Niger.
https://blog.education.nationalgeographic.org/2017/11/06/jus...