top | item 40112839

(no title)

dl9999 | 1 year ago

I think unguided natural processes plus deep time plus multiverses could also be an all-concompassing explanation that can't be proven wrong.

discuss

order

mistermann|1 year ago

Even more fundamental: anything ~false built on top of Naive Realism can exist indefinitely not just undiscovered to be false, but cannot even be identified as a candidate for consideration.

Let's hope we don't have this problem here on planet Earth, and especially at a core, fundamental level(s)!

Kim_Bruning|1 year ago

Hmm, maybe my explanation above was too ELI5, you'll have to accept my apologies if so, and you may need to explain in more detail what you're asking exactly there.

Meanwhile can you expand on your take on Naive Realism here? What's the specific issue with Naive Realism you're pointing out? (am aware there's issues)