top | item 40113255 (no title) ascar | 1 year ago It's not part of RFC 9110, so why should it be included? discuss order hn newest robertlagrant|1 year ago Because this comment chain doesn't mention that RFC. That's in a different one. ascar|1 year ago Fair enough. I lost track of the correct comment chain there.
robertlagrant|1 year ago Because this comment chain doesn't mention that RFC. That's in a different one. ascar|1 year ago Fair enough. I lost track of the correct comment chain there.
robertlagrant|1 year ago
ascar|1 year ago