So? Lack of evidence is not proof positive of the contrary position. Even if you accept that there is no evidence, which is doubtful in itself since the fact that only humans seem to be able to think the way humans think could be considered evidence.
icambron|1 year ago
You similarly have no direct evidence that there isn't a bottle A&W root bear on Europa, but our understanding of the history of humanity (and root beer and space travel) makes it very unlikely. It is reasonable to conclude that there is no such bottle, and wildly unreasonable to posit that there is.
Edit: added the word "direct" + minor clarifications
alienicecream|1 year ago
Assuming the whatsit could fit into the materialistic/mechanistic framework. But that's not necessarily the case.
> You similarly have no direct evidence that there isn't a bottle A&W root bear on Europa, but our understanding of the history of humanity (and root beer and space travel) makes it very unlikely.
I didn't make a claim, I asked you how you can be so sure of your claim.
marcusverus|1 year ago