(no title)
whalee | 1 year ago
If you believe the hypothesis that Americans will pay a huge premium (directly or indirectly by subsidizing the poor build quality) to decrease the mental load by 85% on their twice-daily 35 minute commute, then the company is in good shape.
On top of this, their data moat is enormous and their pipeline is mature. Other car companies seeking this level of autonomous fidelity will need to either race to start harvesting as much data as possible, or make a bet that this quantity will be unnecessary with future models.
Then again, if you don't buy the value-add promise of FSD hypothesis then this company is faltering hard. Cybertruck is flopping in sales (with life-threatening build issues as a bonus), the company is facing deteriorating public perception, the tightening economy makes the 'premium'/'apple' presentation less appealing, serious competitors recently entered the EV market, on and on.
jcranmer|1 year ago
From what I've seen in the past, it's not clear that Tesla is actually collecting all that much data in practice. And the concerns over the quality of FSD isn't something that is easily resolved by mass harvesting of existing drivers' habits.
bdjsiqoocwk|1 year ago
esoterica|1 year ago
basiccalendar74|1 year ago
TheLoafOfBread|1 year ago
SheddingPattern|1 year ago
itsoktocry|1 year ago
FSD may one day be the best, I have no idea. But Tesla do not have a massive lead in autonomous vehicles by any measure.