What's more important is that they demonstrated making diamond at 1 atm and lower temperatures(1025 C). This is compared to ~50,000 atm and ~1500 °C diamond is conventionally made at. The diamonds they made were very small, but this is a new process and optimization might enable it to make bigger diamonds.
Recently determined diamonds normally form in geysers when magma spurts up through layers of rock. Takes minutes, not billions of years.
Anyway, cool article.
Well, slightly harder to replicate under laboratory conditions.
Sort of like if there was an article saying we'd figure out how to harness fusion for power and someone responded with "big deal, have you seen the sun?".
Jewelers have already done this successfully with a lot of gemstones. Artificial rubies, sapphires,and emeralds are dirt cheap, but natural ones are 100-1000x the price.
It's pretty impressive what you can buy on eBay with the words "CVD Diamond" in the title. As best as I can tell, they're chemically identical. (Modulo honesty on eBay, of course.)
On that subject... I love gemstones. I just love them. But "real" aka "natural" ones tends to be very pricey.
Anyone know of reputable brands/places/sellers where I can buy synthetic / lab grown diamonds / sapphires / ruby etc. at a much cheaper price than "natural" ones?
My ex used to buy from best cut gems for her jewelry side hustle. She seemed pretty happy with them, but I dont know how the prices compare. There's also a subreddit about synthetic gems that has a vendor directory in their sidebar. I think the sub is synthetic gemstones.
If you make them cheap enough we can make windowpanes out of diamond.
This is the titular conceit of Neal Stephenson's novel the Diamond Age. In that fictional futuristic word almost anything can be manufactured in nanotechnological "material compilers". And according to the novel if you can do that, at scale it is cheaper, and easier to build transparent panes for windows out of diamond than glass because the chemical structure is simpler.
Diamond with nitrogen valance centers are used as fluorescent markers. If a current passes close they change their emission spectrum. Some workon this as a method to measure neurons firing. So maybe that use case expands. Also quantum applications with diamond.
I just had an idea that may be my worst technology idea ever.
Assemble some unstable atoms (that decay into carbon) into the desired cubic structure. When they decay you have a diamond.
The problem with this is that if it can decay fast enough (even with outside neutrons) it will be too hot (pun intended), and if it decays slowly enough it will take too long. Depending on the source isotopes and process it could also result in a radioactive diamond! Also, the heat of the process would have to not change the crystal structure.
However, some day when we master quarks and the weak interaction we might be able to do this quickly and safely.
Hmm; so the only thing that can "easily" decay into the stable forms of carbon - C12 and C13 that is - is N13 (β+ to C13 with "minutes" half-life). Nothing decays into C12, since N12 or O12 would have half-lifes so short as to make them "doubtful" isotopes.
But Nitrogen wouldn't crystallise in a diamond lattice; nevermind the crystal absorbing "heat" from the radioactive decay disturbing positions temporarily, there's just no way to arrange Nitrogen and Carbon atoms into similar locations of a crystal lattice. This sort of "transmutation" isn't even science fiction, it's only a dream
(follow your dreams but think a few times before trying to make money off them)
Leaving aside the decay part of things, carbon makes a crystal structure of a diamond, other materials don't. So they would refuse to assemble into the right shape.
[+] [-] gene-h|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] JoeAltmaier|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] SketchySeaBeast|1 year ago|reply
Sort of like if there was an article saying we'd figure out how to harness fusion for power and someone responded with "big deal, have you seen the sun?".
[+] [-] squigz|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Simulacra|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] whatindaheck|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] TheAceOfHearts|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dylan604|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Aunche|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Double_a_92|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] xhkkffbf|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Buttons840|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] TacticalCoder|1 year ago|reply
Anyone know of reputable brands/places/sellers where I can buy synthetic / lab grown diamonds / sapphires / ruby etc. at a much cheaper price than "natural" ones?
[+] [-] impossiblefork|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ohmyiv|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] asah|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] bsder|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] DennisP|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] jl6|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] krisoft|1 year ago|reply
This is the titular conceit of Neal Stephenson's novel the Diamond Age. In that fictional futuristic word almost anything can be manufactured in nanotechnological "material compilers". And according to the novel if you can do that, at scale it is cheaper, and easier to build transparent panes for windows out of diamond than glass because the chemical structure is simpler.
[+] [-] luma|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] FrameworkFred|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] NegativeLatency|1 year ago|reply
Diamond bearings?
IDK if the technique can create such a large crystal though.
[+] [-] vonzepp|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] rsfern|1 year ago|reply
https://ece.illinois.edu/newsroom/63402
[+] [-] tithe|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] fmajid|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] schaefer|1 year ago|reply
But what will we do about our new existential crisis... If we no longer need to dig for diamonds, why would we dig at all?
[+] [-] kloch|1 year ago|reply
Assemble some unstable atoms (that decay into carbon) into the desired cubic structure. When they decay you have a diamond.
The problem with this is that if it can decay fast enough (even with outside neutrons) it will be too hot (pun intended), and if it decays slowly enough it will take too long. Depending on the source isotopes and process it could also result in a radioactive diamond! Also, the heat of the process would have to not change the crystal structure.
However, some day when we master quarks and the weak interaction we might be able to do this quickly and safely.
[+] [-] fch42|1 year ago|reply
But Nitrogen wouldn't crystallise in a diamond lattice; nevermind the crystal absorbing "heat" from the radioactive decay disturbing positions temporarily, there's just no way to arrange Nitrogen and Carbon atoms into similar locations of a crystal lattice. This sort of "transmutation" isn't even science fiction, it's only a dream
(follow your dreams but think a few times before trying to make money off them)
[+] [-] Ellipsis753|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ars|1 year ago|reply