top | item 40188282

Show HN: Docker-phobia: Analyze Docker image size with a treemap

91 points| remorses | 1 year ago |github.com

30 comments

order

bertman|1 year ago

Why does this need to pipe a script into bash from a non-github origin?

And in that script, you're actually piping another script from yet another domain (`https://goblin.reaper.im/`), where reaper.im looks like some kind of ad-infested parking domain?

remorses|1 year ago

You can also install it with go, I updated the readme

go install github.com/remorses/docker-phobia

akshat2602|1 year ago

Looks like goblin.run is a project that lets you install golang projects without having golang installed. OP should probably preface the installation script with this.

Scipio_Afri|1 year ago

Not using https is bad.

curl -sf http://goblin.run/github.com/remorses/docker-phobia | sh

Also why just include that shell script in the repo and have people curl that?

remorses|1 year ago

Goblin is a service that builds a go binary for your platform on the fly and downloads it in PATH. This is a much faster way than setting up Github Actions to build an executable for every possible platform on every release. You can also use go install if you know what you are doing.

Wingy|1 year ago

curl should probably scream when it detects piping unencrypted wan (not local ips) connections to shell, sort of like what openssh does when a host’s fingerprint changes

jijijijij|1 year ago

Lol. This is an hilariously shady instruction. Is this a docker inside joke or something?

XiS|1 year ago

Cool, gonna try this soon. Would be great to use in combination with Dive (https://github.com/wagoodman/dive)

pronik|1 year ago

It says in the README it leverages Dive. Basically it's a visualization for Dive's JSON output, which I'd very much prefer to exist as exactly that -- something I can pipe Dive's JSON into. No need to wrap Dive for that.

willswire|1 year ago

Ran this instead of that scary pipe thru sh command

go install github.com/remorses/docker-phobia@latest

_joel|1 year ago

No thanks, this looks shady as hell.

btreecat|1 year ago

I don't remember what this type of visualisation this is called, but I really like it for understanding disk use quickly. When I wish to drill into detail I find a list helps me more but the box layout is usually where I like to start.

Looking forward to trying this.

xmorse|1 year ago

It's a treemap graph, frontend people use it all the time to analyze a website javascript bundle size, I created this so Docker people can make smaller images more easily

TopRainbowT|1 year ago

Sounds great, I'm looking forward to giving this a shot.

cheptsov|1 year ago

Why not just show it per layer and folder via plain text?