Do you honestly think that every article posted on a product's blog should include a disclaimer that the post may contain information highlighting the usefulness of their product?
> I agree but I hate it when at the end of an article I realize it was just an ad.
If you wanted to be reductive: if the domain ends in .com, you can assume the submission is an ad. Some ads are better quality and worth discussing and some aren't.
More and more blog posts that make it to the HN front page are content marketing.
Nothing nefarious about it -- it's just a deliberate strategy on the part of companies like Retool or Supabase or Fly or whatever to market their services to this target market.
I have no idea how many actual sales conversations it leads to, but it sure is effective at convincing many HN readers that those are cool companies selling cool things...
sward-zk|1 year ago
marcinzm|1 year ago
eatonphil|1 year ago
If you wanted to be reductive: if the domain ends in .com, you can assume the submission is an ad. Some ads are better quality and worth discussing and some aren't.
drewda|1 year ago
Nothing nefarious about it -- it's just a deliberate strategy on the part of companies like Retool or Supabase or Fly or whatever to market their services to this target market.
I have no idea how many actual sales conversations it leads to, but it sure is effective at convincing many HN readers that those are cool companies selling cool things...
cryptonector|1 year ago